.jpg)
In a high-sakes gamble leaving little to chance, Kroger and Albertsons have put nearly 600 stores worth over $8 billion squarely on the chopping block. The grocery titans just unveiled a audacious divestiture plan spanning 19 states in hopes of convincing federal regulators their $25 billion megadeal doesn't violate antitrust laws. It marks a dramatic all-in escalation as both companies double down on securing merger approval at any cost.
The extensive list released this week itemizes 579 specific locations the combined entity would offload to C&S Wholesale Grocers - the lucky grocer slated to become America's third-largest player if this Hail Mary restructuring satisfies the doubting Federal Trade Commission. With over 100 Arizona stores, 124 Washington outposts, 91 Colorado markets, and 63 California sites on the chopping block, the divestment footprint surpasses most major regional chains' entire networks.
But Kroger and Albertsons seem convinced dismantling nearly a quarter of their joint 2,700-store empire is a necessary sacrifice worth making. Because while that may seem an eyebrow-raising percentage, it crucially solves market overlap issues fueling the FTC's original antitrust lawsuit blocking the whole transaction. With less territorial redundancy post-selloff, the remaining 2,100 locations gain smoother sailing.
The audacious scope signals both grocers now treating regulatory approval efforts as existential must-wins rather than theoretical negotiating gambits. Having already revised plans once by upping the original 413-store sacrifice to 579, leadership teams leave no doubts about utter seriousness in remedying concentration concerns derailing previous megamergers like the blocked Albertsons-Rite Aid deal years back.
In fact, throwing in the extra 166 stores alongside six entire distribution centers and an $800 million dairy plant operation underscores uncompromising commitment to convincing skittish trustbusters. Kroger CEO Rodney McMullen left no wiggle room, brazenly proclaming all frontline workers will remain employed at divested stores with compensation, healthcare, and pensions honored as if under original umbrellas.
Such boldness stems from the stakes involved - because behind relentless insistence this combination creates more consumer benefits than antitrust harm lurks a harsh reality. Albertsons increasingly looks a melting ice cube staring down existential obsolescence absent Kroger's rescuing embrace and scale. Kroger in turn dares not let this quarry elude its clutches despite the FTC's dogged resistance.
Without Albertsons folded into its stable, Kroger faces wildly intensifying pressures as relatively lagging e-commerce and technological modernization efforts slow-bleed its traditional footprint versus more nimble, data-obsessive Amazon/Whole Foods and ascendant discounters. For Albertsons, the future stretches bleaker still - a lumbering physical relic with insufficient capital investment firepower or culture required for withstanding rapacious Walmart, Aldi, and Lidl onslaughts in unforgiving deflation trenches.
In other words, the stars align such that this gambit could represent literally the last off-ramp to salvation before two once-proud heritage brands careen off opposite ends of the competitive cliff. Kroger has everything to gain - Albertsons, everything to lose by not doing absolutely whatever regulators demand to get this all-important deal across fading finish lines.
That dynamic casts the 579 stores as essential bargaining chips for purchasing conditional regulatory blessing - not a terminal depletion of future combined scale/synergy potential. Getting folded into a 2,100-location grocery juggernaut could ironically improve commercial staying power versus being marooned among deserted outposts left behind. Some underperforming units could find new life by monetizing truncated banners scavenged off carcasses.
The calculation seems solidly grounded that a begrudgingly permitted slimmer merger still creates a more imposing national player than perpetuating slow-atrophy trajectories long distrusted by investors. Perhaps more importantly in an Amazon/Walmart battleground, the revised combination enhances ability to assemble lucrative delivery/pickup ecosystems, extract supplier discounts, attract talent, and embrace reinvention.
Rare Chance to Be an Early Investor in AI Energy Breakthrough
Technology expert Ian King has found a way to invest in the technology powering AI energy.A breakthrough that presents a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity for fast-acting investors.
Just go here for full details.
But with all divestment pieces now ostentatiously tabled, Kroger and Albertsons forfeit future negotiating flexibility and safety nets. The FTC understands the pair has displayed its entire hand by putting maximum theoretical concessions into play. And federal antitrust hawks may still balk at even compromise proposals leaving any whiff of excessive regional monopolization, inferior quality/selection, workforce dislocation, or higher future pricing.
So prepare for drawn-out psychological warfare pitting antitrust dogmatists howling about decimated Big Ag competition versus two desperate legacy horses bidding a coordinated farewell if denied long-overdue stable expansion. Neither side can afford losing the regulatory poker tournament now that maximum chips have been shipped into the daunting middlewith no contingency fallbacks remaining.
For while Kroger and Albertsons can keep plying trustbusters with perpetual store divestitures, there eventually arrives a threshold efficacy quotient in preserving viable long-term combined scale and autonomous longevity. Every asset stripped compromises the defendable rationale behind suffering years of FTC purgatory only to emerge a paler shadow of original ambitions. Optimum concession frontiers are blurry - and stakeholders may balk if ultimately over-negotiated blueprints start feeling disrespectfully hollow.
Make no mistake, grocery's potential new behemoth sees its survival encapsulated by this cosmos-straining gambit. Because betting a combined 22% of total stores tends to signal you've exhausted all other tactics before either regulating agencies mercifully grant permission - or else order the entire endeavor summarily detonated as an existential risk to the sector. For Kroger and Albertsons, this unthinkable scenario now looms larger than ever following latest brinksmanship escalation leaving them all in with everything on the line.
